XNAS · Capital Markets
Last stored close · Sep 18, 2026
Close · Sep 18, 2026
$98.74+8.52%
Model Target
—
not published for this name
Implied upside
—
vs the model target
Valuation methods
—
no method met the standard
TickerWhale Score
31/100
Weak
Score components
TickerWhale View
Hut 8 scores 31 out of 100 overall, which we rate weak. Risk is its strongest area and Valuation its weakest.
What helps
- Technical
- Risk
- Sentiment Signal
What to watch
- Quality & growth
- Valuation
Quality & growth
30%8Weak
- Revenue growth 129.5%
- EPS growth -718.3%
Valuation
25%1Weak
- P/E -19.5
- EV/Sales 38.1
Price history
Intraday to five-year windows are free with an account
Members switch between 1D, 1M, 6M, 1Y, 2Y and 5Y and see the live price. Signed out, this is the one-year stored series the technicals below are computed from.
Market intelligence
Peer position
#183 / 197sector rank by TickerWhale Score
TickerWhale Score 31 vs sector average 49.7 (-18.7)
Revenue growth (industry)Top 7%
Gross margin (industry)Top 64%
Return on equity (industry)Top 90%
Technical analysis
our read · what classic indicators sayTickerWhale technical read
65/100Positive vs universe
Ranks 65th of 100 covered names on our technical composite — the composite itself scores 55/100 · 25% of the TickerWhale Score
Classic chart indicators
Buy
3 buy · 2 sell · 3 neutral of 8 votes
TickerWhale rates HUT's technical setup middling — 65th percentile of the covered universe. Classic chart indicators lean buy, pointing the same way.
Moving averages
8 / 9constructive
- vs 200-day+27.3%
- vs 50-day+5.9%
Momentum
Mixed
- RSI (14)56 · neutral
- Stochasticsell
- CCIneutral
- Williams %Rsell
Trend
Mixed
- ADX (14) trend strength18· weak trend
- MACD (12,26,9)buy(histogram 1.287)
How the classic verdict is reached
Moving averages (9) agree on buy — 8 buy vs 1 sell — and carry one vote between them.
Oscillators (7) vote individually: 2 buy · 2 sell · 3 neutral.
Result — 3 buy vs 2 sell of 8 votes = Buy. Neutral votes never decide the verdict.
Fundamentals & valuation
2026-09-18 · revised_latestValuation multiples
- P/E (TTM)-19.5 · TTM loss
- P/S (TTM)36.8
- P/B8.1
- EV/EBITDA—
- EV/Sales38.1
- PEG—
Profitability & returns
- Gross margin62.3%
- Net margin-188.7%
- ROE-42.5%
- Debt/Equity0.45
Growth
- Revenue growth (YoY)129.5%
- EPS growth (YoY)-718.3%
Green favourable · red stretched — multiples and D/E vs industry peers, margins and growth vs absolute thresholds.
Market capitalisation — $11.7B
Fundamentals history
Reported statement totals across recent periods.
Fundamentals are stored revised/latest (ADR-009): each period reflects the most recent vendor refresh, NOT point-in-time as-reported values. Do not use this series to claim what was known on a past date.
Model Target
Model Target — Under Review
Our valuation methods do not currently agree closely enough for us to publish a single target for this company. We would rather say so than print a number we cannot stand behind. The TickerWhale Score still reflects quality, growth and momentum.
Peers
| Company | Score | Pulse | P/E | P/E fwd | P/B | EV/Sales | Price | Chg | Estimate | Upside | Rev. gr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUTCurrentHut 8 | 31 | 55 | -19.5 | — | 8.1 | 38.1 | $98.74 | +8.52% | +129.5% | ||
| WTMWhite Mountains Insurance Group | 84 | 52 | 4.5 | — | 0.9 | 1.5 | $2,061.30 | +0.14% | +55.5% | ||
| JXNJackson Financial Inc - | 83 | 74 | 158.1 | — | 0.9 | 1.0 | $132.67 | +2.54% | +15.1% | ||
| FBPFirst Bancorp PR | 80 | 69 | 11.4 | — | 2.2 | 3.1 | $27.58 | +0.22% | +2.7% | ||
| AMPAmeriprise Financial | 78 | 69 | 12.8 | — | 7.9 | 2.4 | $544.33 | -0.25% | +9.1% | ||
| SEICSEI Investments Company | 76 | 72 | 18.4 | — | 5.2 | 5.2 | $105.20 | +0.33% | +11.1% |
News, sentiment, the Street view and Ask Willy are free with an account
A free account shows the stories attached to this name, the Sentiment Signal breakdown, analyst consensus, the options read and the AI narration of the model output.