XNYS · Building Products & Equipment
Last stored close · Sep 18, 2026
Close · Sep 18, 2026
$65.32-0.76%
Model Target
—
not published for this name
Implied upside
—
vs the model target
Valuation methods
—
no method met the standard
TickerWhale Score
43/100
Weak
Score components
TickerWhale View
Louisiana-Pacific scores 43 out of 100 overall, which we rate weak. Risk is its strongest area and Quality & growth its weakest.
What helps
- Valuation
- Risk
What to watch
- Technical
- Quality & growth
- Sentiment Signal
Quality & growth
30%6Weak
- Revenue growth -14.3%
- EPS growth -81.4%
Valuation
25%92Strong
- P/E 84.7
- EV/Sales 1.9
Price history
Intraday to five-year windows are free with an account
Members switch between 1D, 1M, 6M, 1Y, 2Y and 5Y and see the live price. Signed out, this is the one-year stored series the technicals below are computed from.
Market intelligence
Peer position
#57 / 79sector rank by TickerWhale Score
TickerWhale Score 43 vs sector average 48.8 (-5.8)
Revenue growth (industry)Top 100%
Gross margin (industry)Top 100%
Return on equity (industry)Top 85%
P/E (industry)Pricier than 92%
Technical analysis
our read · what classic indicators sayTickerWhale technical read
10/100Weak vs universe
Ranks 10th of 100 covered names on our technical composite — the composite itself scores 22/100 · 25% of the TickerWhale Score
Classic chart indicators
Sell
2 buy · 4 sell · 2 neutral of 8 votes
TickerWhale rates LPX's technical setup weak — 10th percentile of the covered universe. Classic chart indicators lean sell, pointing the same way.
Moving averages
0 / 9constructive
- vs 200-day-15.8%
- vs 50-day-9.1%
Momentum
Mixed
- RSI (14)37 · neutral
- Stochasticbuy
- CCIneutral
- Williams %Rbuy
Trend
Weak
- ADX (14) trend strength31· trending
- MACD (12,26,9)sell(histogram -0.180)
How the classic verdict is reached
Moving averages (9) agree on sell — 0 buy vs 9 sell — and carry one vote between them.
Oscillators (7) vote individually: 2 buy · 3 sell · 2 neutral.
Result — 2 buy vs 4 sell of 8 votes = Sell. Neutral votes never decide the verdict.
Fundamentals & valuation
2026-09-18 · revised_latestValuation multiples
- P/E (TTM)84.7
- P/S (TTM)1.9
- P/B2.6
- EV/EBITDA—
- EV/Sales1.9
- PEG—
Profitability & returns
- Gross margin18.0%
- Net margin2.2%
- ROE3.1%
- Debt/Equity0.20
Growth
- Revenue growth (YoY)-14.3%
- EPS growth (YoY)-81.4%
Green favourable · red stretched — multiples and D/E vs industry peers, margins and growth vs absolute thresholds.
Market capitalisation — $4.6B
Fundamentals history
Reported statement totals across recent periods.
Fundamentals are stored revised/latest (ADR-009): each period reflects the most recent vendor refresh, NOT point-in-time as-reported values. Do not use this series to claim what was known on a past date.
Model Target
Model Target — Under Review
Our valuation methods do not currently agree closely enough for us to publish a single target for this company. We would rather say so than print a number we cannot stand behind. The TickerWhale Score still reflects quality, growth and momentum.
Peers
| Company | Score | Pulse | P/E | P/E fwd | P/B | EV/Sales | Price | Chg | Estimate | Upside | Rev. gr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPXCurrentLouisiana-Pacific | 43 | 22 | 84.7 | — | 2.6 | 1.9 | $65.32 | -0.76% | -14.3% | ||
| RGLDRoyal Gold | 79 | 65 | 28.8 | — | 2.8 | 13.9 | $249.65 | -0.72% | +93.5% | ||
| NEMNewmont | 78 | 71 | 15.3 | — | 3.7 | 5.0 | $123.41 | -0.79% | +25.2% | ||
| AEMAgnico Eagle Mines | 77 | 64 | 17.1 | — | 3.5 | 6.7 | $199.49 | -0.93% | +50.3% | ||
| BBarrick Gold | 75 | 59 | 11.1 | — | 2.7 | 3.5 | $43.33 | -0.82% | +49.4% | ||
| CDECoeur Mining | 75 | 55 | 24.0 | — | 2.0 | 6.3 | $19.76 | -1.10% | +117.3% |
News, sentiment, the Street view and Ask Willy are free with an account
A free account shows the stories attached to this name, the Sentiment Signal breakdown, analyst consensus, the options read and the AI narration of the model output.