XNAS · Software - Application
Last stored close · Sep 18, 2026
Close · Sep 18, 2026
$15.10-2.58%
Model Target
—
not published for this name
Implied upside
—
vs the model target
Valuation methods
—
no method met the standard
TickerWhale Score
70/100
Strong
Score components
TickerWhale View
Lyft Inc Cls A scores 70 out of 100 overall, which we rate strong. Valuation is its strongest area and Technical its weakest.
What helps
- Quality & growth
- Valuation
- Risk
What to watch
- Technical
- Sentiment Signal
Quality & growth
30%93Strong
- Revenue growth 10.8%
- EPS growth 3072.7%
Valuation
25%99Strong
- P/E 2.0
- EV/Sales 0.8
Price history
Intraday to five-year windows are free with an account
Members switch between 1D, 1M, 6M, 1Y, 2Y and 5Y and see the live price. Signed out, this is the one-year stored series the technicals below are computed from.
Market intelligence
Peer position
#17 / 207sector rank by TickerWhale Score
TickerWhale Score 70 vs sector average 53.5 (+16.5)
Revenue growth (industry)Top 81%
Gross margin (industry)Top 96%
Return on equity (industry)Top 10%
P/E (industry)Cheaper than 100%
Technical analysis
our read · what classic indicators sayTickerWhale technical read
29/100Weak vs universe
Ranks 29th of 100 covered names on our technical composite — the composite itself scores 36/100 · 25% of the TickerWhale Score
Classic chart indicators
Sell
2 buy · 3 sell · 3 neutral of 8 votes
TickerWhale rates LYFT's technical setup weak — 29th percentile of the covered universe. Classic chart indicators lean sell, pointing the same way.
Moving averages
0 / 9constructive
- vs 200-day-4.0%
- vs 50-day-7.2%
Momentum
Mixed
- RSI (14)38 · neutral
- Stochasticbuy
- CCIneutral
- Williams %Rbuy
Trend
Mixed
- ADX (14) trend strength16· weak trend
- MACD (12,26,9)sell(histogram -0.184)
How the classic verdict is reached
Moving averages (9) agree on sell — 0 buy vs 9 sell — and carry one vote between them.
Oscillators (7) vote individually: 2 buy · 2 sell · 3 neutral.
Result — 2 buy vs 3 sell of 8 votes = Sell. Neutral votes never decide the verdict.
Fundamentals & valuation
2026-09-18 · revised_latestValuation multiples
- P/E (TTM)2.0
- P/S (TTM)0.9
- P/B1.9
- EV/EBITDA—
- EV/Sales0.8
- PEG—
Profitability & returns
- Gross margin45.5%
- Net margin42.3%
- ROE94.7%
- Debt/Equity0.33
Growth
- Revenue growth (YoY)10.8%
- EPS growth (YoY)3072.7%
Green favourable · red stretched — multiples and D/E vs industry peers, margins and growth vs absolute thresholds.
Market capitalisation — $5.8B
Fundamentals history
Reported statement totals across recent periods.
Fundamentals are stored revised/latest (ADR-009): each period reflects the most recent vendor refresh, NOT point-in-time as-reported values. Do not use this series to claim what was known on a past date.
Model Target
Model Target — Under Review
Our valuation methods do not currently agree closely enough for us to publish a single target for this company. We would rather say so than print a number we cannot stand behind. The TickerWhale Score still reflects quality, growth and momentum.
Peers
| Company | Score | Pulse | P/E | P/E fwd | P/B | EV/Sales | Price | Chg | Estimate | Upside | Rev. gr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYFTCurrentLyft Inc Cls A | 70 | 36 | 2.0 | — | 1.9 | 0.8 | $15.10 | -2.58% | +10.8% | ||
| MSFTMicrosoft | 79 | 67 | 27.5 | — | 8.3 | 11.1 | $493.78 | -0.80% | +17.8% | ||
| MUMicron Technology | 77 | 57 | 23.0 | — | 11.5 | 12.7 | $1,015.80 | +3.92% | +167.0% | ||
| NVDANVIDIA | 77 | 68 | 28.0 | — | 23.6 | 17.9 | $222.27 | +1.34% | +83.4% | ||
| NTNXNutanix Inc - | 76 | 73 | 13.6 | — | 29.1 | 7.4 | $69.80 | -0.24% | +12.4% | ||
| DUOLDuolingo Inc - | 75 | 50 | 17.3 | — | 5.0 | 5.2 | $141.90 | -3.54% | +29.4% |
News, sentiment, the Street view and Ask Willy are free with an account
A free account shows the stories attached to this name, the Sentiment Signal breakdown, analyst consensus, the options read and the AI narration of the model output.