XASE · Uranium
Last stored close · Sep 18, 2026
Close · Sep 18, 2026
$9.81-3.06%
Model Target
—
not published for this name
Implied upside
—
vs the model target
Valuation methods
—
no method met the standard
TickerWhale Score
17/100
Weak
Score components
TickerWhale View
Uranium Energy scores 17 out of 100 overall, which we rate weak. Risk is its strongest area and Technical its weakest.
What helps
- Risk
What to watch
- Technical
- Quality & growth
- Valuation
Quality & growth
30%1Weak
- Revenue growth -69.8%
- EPS growth n/a
Valuation
25%1Weak
- P/E -46.1
- EV/Sales 214.1
Price history
Intraday to five-year windows are free with an account
Members switch between 1D, 1M, 6M, 1Y, 2Y and 5Y and see the live price. Signed out, this is the one-year stored series the technicals below are computed from.
Market intelligence
Peer position
#77 / 79sector rank by TickerWhale Score
TickerWhale Score 17 vs sector average 48.8 (-31.8)
Revenue growth (sector)Top 100%
Return on equity (sector)Top 81%
Technical analysis
our read · what classic indicators sayTickerWhale technical read
1/100Weak vs universe
Ranks 1st of 100 covered names on our technical composite — the composite itself scores 10/100 · 25% of the TickerWhale Score
Classic chart indicators
Sell
2 buy · 4 sell · 2 neutral of 8 votes
TickerWhale rates UEC's technical setup weak — 1st percentile of the covered universe. Classic chart indicators lean sell, pointing the same way.
Moving averages
0 / 9constructive
- vs 200-day-25.8%
- vs 50-day-9.5%
Momentum
Mixed
- RSI (14)35 · neutral
- Stochasticbuy
- CCIsell
- Williams %Rbuy
Trend
Mixed
- ADX (14) trend strength14· weak trend
- MACD (12,26,9)sell(histogram -0.268)
How the classic verdict is reached
Moving averages (9) agree on sell — 0 buy vs 9 sell — and carry one vote between them.
Oscillators (7) vote individually: 2 buy · 3 sell · 2 neutral.
Result — 2 buy vs 4 sell of 8 votes = Sell. Neutral votes never decide the verdict.
Fundamentals & valuation
2026-09-18 · revised_latestValuation multiples
- P/E (TTM)-46.1 · TTM loss
- P/S (TTM)238.3
- P/B3.4
- EV/EBITDA—
- EV/Sales214.1
- PEG—
Profitability & returns
- Gross margin—
- Net margin-516.5%
- ROE-7.4%
- Debt/Equity0.00
Growth
- Revenue growth (YoY)-69.8%
- EPS growth (YoY)—
Green favourable · red stretched — multiples and D/E vs sector peers, margins and growth vs absolute thresholds.
Market capitalisation — $4.8B
Fundamentals history
Reported statement totals across recent periods.
Fundamentals are stored revised/latest (ADR-009): each period reflects the most recent vendor refresh, NOT point-in-time as-reported values. Do not use this series to claim what was known on a past date.
Model Target
Model Target — Under Review
Our valuation methods do not currently agree closely enough for us to publish a single target for this company. We would rather say so than print a number we cannot stand behind. The TickerWhale Score still reflects quality, growth and momentum.
Peers
| Company | Score | Pulse | P/E | P/E fwd | P/B | EV/Sales | Price | Chg | Estimate | Upside | Rev. gr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UECCurrentUranium Energy | 17 | 10 | -46.1 | — | 3.4 | 214.1 | $9.81 | -3.06% | -69.8% | ||
| RGLDRoyal Gold | 79 | 65 | 28.8 | — | 2.8 | 13.9 | $249.65 | -0.72% | +93.5% | ||
| NEMNewmont | 78 | 71 | 15.3 | — | 3.7 | 5.0 | $123.41 | -0.79% | +25.2% | ||
| AEMAgnico Eagle Mines | 77 | 64 | 17.1 | — | 3.5 | 6.7 | $199.49 | -0.93% | +50.3% | ||
| BBarrick Gold | 75 | 59 | 11.1 | — | 2.7 | 3.5 | $43.33 | -0.82% | +49.4% | ||
| CDECoeur Mining | 75 | 55 | 24.0 | — | 2.0 | 6.3 | $19.76 | -1.10% | +117.3% |
News, sentiment, the Street view and Ask Willy are free with an account
A free account shows the stories attached to this name, the Sentiment Signal breakdown, analyst consensus, the options read and the AI narration of the model output.