XASE · Uranium
Last stored close · Nov 10, 2026
Close · Nov 10, 2026
$6.74-7.80%
Model Target
—
not published for this name
Implied upside
—
vs the model target
Valuation methods
—
no method met the standard
TickerWhale Score
31/100
Weak
Score components
TickerWhale View
Energy Fuels scores 31 out of 100 overall, which we rate weak. Quality & growth is its strongest area and Technical its weakest.
What helps
- Quality & growth
What to watch
- Technical
- Valuation
- Risk
Quality & growth
30%79Strong
- Revenue growth 62.5%
- EPS growth n/a
Valuation
25%1Weak
- P/E -20.6
- EV/Sales 21.7
Price history
Intraday to five-year windows are free with an account
Members switch between 1D, 1M, 6M, 1Y, 2Y and 5Y and see the live price. Signed out, this is the one-year stored series the technicals below are computed from.
Market intelligence
Peer position
#70 / 78sector rank by TickerWhale Score
TickerWhale Score 31 vs sector average 48.8 (-17.8)
Revenue growth (sector)Top 6%
Gross margin (sector)Top 26%
Return on equity (sector)Top 86%
Technical analysis
our read · what classic indicators sayTickerWhale technical read
1/100Weak vs universe
Ranks 1st of 100 covered names on our technical composite — the composite itself scores 8/100 · 25% of the TickerWhale Score
Classic chart indicators
Strong Sell
1 buy · 5 sell · 2 neutral of 8 votes
TickerWhale rates UUUU's technical setup weak — 1st percentile of the covered universe. Classic chart indicators lean sell, pointing the same way.
Moving averages
0 / 9constructive
- vs 200-day-57.3%
- vs 50-day-34.1%
Momentum
Weak
- RSI (14)31 · neutral
- Stochasticsell
- CCIsell
- Williams %Rneutral
Trend
Mixed
- ADX (14) trend strength48· trending
- MACD (12,26,9)buy(histogram 0.046)
How the classic verdict is reached
Moving averages (9) agree on sell — 0 buy vs 9 sell — and carry one vote between them.
Oscillators (7) vote individually: 1 buy · 4 sell · 2 neutral.
Result — 1 buy vs 5 sell of 8 votes = Strong Sell. Neutral votes never decide the verdict.
Fundamentals & valuation
2026-11-10 · revised_latestValuation multiples
- P/E (TTM)-20.6 · TTM loss
- P/S (TTM)15.9
- P/B2.1
- EV/EBITDA—
- EV/Sales21.7
- PEG—
Profitability & returns
- Gross margin40.9%
- Net margin-77.3%
- ROE-10.8%
- Debt/Equity0.85
Growth
- Revenue growth (YoY)62.5%
- EPS growth (YoY)—
Green favourable · red stretched — multiples and D/E vs sector peers, margins and growth vs absolute thresholds.
Market capitalisation — $1.7B
Fundamentals history
Reported statement totals across recent periods.
Fundamentals are stored revised/latest (ADR-009): each period reflects the most recent vendor refresh, NOT point-in-time as-reported values. Do not use this series to claim what was known on a past date.
Model Target
Model Target — Under Review
Our valuation methods do not currently agree closely enough for us to publish a single target for this company. We would rather say so than print a number we cannot stand behind. The TickerWhale Score still reflects quality, growth and momentum.
Peers
| Company | Score | Pulse | P/E | P/E fwd | P/B | EV/Sales | Price | Chg | Estimate | Upside | Rev. gr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UUUUCurrentEnergy Fuels | 31 | 8 | -20.6 | — | 2.1 | 21.7 | $6.74 | -7.80% | +62.5% | ||
| RGLDRoyal Gold | 78 | 80 | 31.6 | — | 3.1 | 15.2 | $274.57 | -2.86% | +93.5% | ||
| PPGPPG Industries | 75 | 80 | 17.7 | — | 3.3 | 2.0 | $124.42 | -0.71% | +5.0% | ||
| CFCF Industries Holdings | 73 | 63 | 9.0 | — | 3.3 | 2.5 | $122.36 | +2.58% | +20.0% | ||
| AEMAgnico Eagle Mines | 71 | 55 | 16.3 | — | 3.3 | 6.4 | $190.46 | -5.15% | +50.3% | ||
| NEMNewmont | 70 | 63 | 14.9 | — | 3.6 | 4.8 | $119.96 | -4.15% | +25.2% |
News, sentiment, the Street view and Ask Willy are free with an account
A free account shows the stories attached to this name, the Sentiment Signal breakdown, analyst consensus, the options read and the AI narration of the model output.