XASE · Uranium
Last stored close · Sep 18, 2026
Close · Sep 18, 2026
$11.70-2.34%
Model Target
—
not published for this name
Implied upside
—
vs the model target
Valuation methods
—
no method met the standard
TickerWhale Score
22/100
Weak
Score components
TickerWhale View
Energy Fuels scores 22 out of 100 overall, which we rate weak. Sentiment Signal is its strongest area and Technical its weakest.
What helps
What to watch
- Technical
- Quality & growth
- Valuation
Quality & growth
30%48Moderate
- Revenue growth 62.5%
- EPS growth n/a
Valuation
25%1Weak
- P/E -35.7
- EV/Sales 33.4
Price history
Intraday to five-year windows are free with an account
Members switch between 1D, 1M, 6M, 1Y, 2Y and 5Y and see the live price. Signed out, this is the one-year stored series the technicals below are computed from.
Market intelligence
Peer position
#74 / 79sector rank by TickerWhale Score
TickerWhale Score 22 vs sector average 48.8 (-26.8)
Revenue growth (sector)Top 6%
Gross margin (sector)Top 27%
Return on equity (sector)Top 86%
Technical analysis
our read · what classic indicators sayTickerWhale technical read
1/100Weak vs universe
Ranks 1st of 100 covered names on our technical composite — the composite itself scores 9/100 · 25% of the TickerWhale Score
Classic chart indicators
Sell
2 buy · 4 sell · 2 neutral of 8 votes
TickerWhale rates UUUU's technical setup weak — 1st percentile of the covered universe. Classic chart indicators lean sell, pointing the same way.
Moving averages
0 / 9constructive
- vs 200-day-32.5%
- vs 50-day-12.3%
Momentum
Mixed
- RSI (14)34 · neutral
- Stochasticbuy
- CCIsell
- Williams %Rbuy
Trend
Mixed
- ADX (14) trend strength16· weak trend
- MACD (12,26,9)sell(histogram -0.362)
How the classic verdict is reached
Moving averages (9) agree on sell — 0 buy vs 9 sell — and carry one vote between them.
Oscillators (7) vote individually: 2 buy · 3 sell · 2 neutral.
Result — 2 buy vs 4 sell of 8 votes = Sell. Neutral votes never decide the verdict.
Fundamentals & valuation
2026-09-18 · revised_latestValuation multiples
- P/E (TTM)-35.7 · TTM loss
- P/S (TTM)27.6
- P/B3.7
- EV/EBITDA—
- EV/Sales33.4
- PEG—
Profitability & returns
- Gross margin40.9%
- Net margin-77.3%
- ROE-10.8%
- Debt/Equity0.85
Growth
- Revenue growth (YoY)62.5%
- EPS growth (YoY)—
Green favourable · red stretched — multiples and D/E vs sector peers, margins and growth vs absolute thresholds.
Market capitalisation — $2.9B
Fundamentals history
Reported statement totals across recent periods.
Fundamentals are stored revised/latest (ADR-009): each period reflects the most recent vendor refresh, NOT point-in-time as-reported values. Do not use this series to claim what was known on a past date.
Model Target
Model Target — Under Review
Our valuation methods do not currently agree closely enough for us to publish a single target for this company. We would rather say so than print a number we cannot stand behind. The TickerWhale Score still reflects quality, growth and momentum.
Peers
| Company | Score | Pulse | P/E | P/E fwd | P/B | EV/Sales | Price | Chg | Estimate | Upside | Rev. gr. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UUUUCurrentEnergy Fuels | 22 | 9 | -35.7 | — | 3.7 | 33.4 | $11.70 | -2.34% | +62.5% | ||
| RGLDRoyal Gold | 79 | 65 | 28.8 | — | 2.8 | 13.9 | $249.65 | -0.72% | +93.5% | ||
| NEMNewmont | 78 | 71 | 15.3 | — | 3.7 | 5.0 | $123.41 | -0.79% | +25.2% | ||
| AEMAgnico Eagle Mines | 77 | 64 | 17.1 | — | 3.5 | 6.7 | $199.49 | -0.93% | +50.3% | ||
| BBarrick Gold | 75 | 59 | 11.1 | — | 2.7 | 3.5 | $43.33 | -0.82% | +49.4% | ||
| CDECoeur Mining | 75 | 55 | 24.0 | — | 2.0 | 6.3 | $19.76 | -1.10% | +117.3% |
News, sentiment, the Street view and Ask Willy are free with an account
A free account shows the stories attached to this name, the Sentiment Signal breakdown, analyst consensus, the options read and the AI narration of the model output.